Defensible AI governance for your firm.

For law firm GCs, risk partners, CIOs, and KM leaders who need defensible AI governance.

Activity

Live AI session capture

Live
SC

Sarah Chen

ChatGPT
Flagged
MP

Marcus Patel

Claude
OK
ÉT

Élise Tremblay

M365 Copilot
OK
DO

David Okonkwo

Perplexity
Live
AR

Aisha Rahman

Claude
OK
JW

James Whitford

ChatGPT
OK
SC

Sarah Chen

·ChatGPT

Today 2:47 PM · Hartwell Industries

⚠ Flagged

User prompt

Draft a motion to dismiss for the Hartwell deposition. Here's the witness statement: “Mr. Hartwell admitted under oath that he…”

Policy analysis · Critical

Confidential client testimony shared with a personal AI account.

ABA 512 · Confidentiality (1.6)Firm AUP §3.2

Compliance Health

Across every framework you've turned on

72%Overall

14 of 19 obligation categories fully compliant.

▲ +9 in 30 days

ABA 512United States
78%
FLSCCanada
91%
SRAUnited Kingdom
65%
EU AI ActEuropean Union
52%

Features

What CounselGuard does

Each feature is tied to a job your governance team already has.

AI Tools

5 registered

ChatGPT

chatgpt.com

Approved

Claude

claude.ai

Approved

M365 Copilot

m365.cloud.microsoft

Approved

Perplexity

perplexity.ai

Restricted

Harvey

harvey.ai

Prohibited
AI Tool List

A live registry of every AI tool used in your firm — who's using what, and what's approved.

Offices

4 jurisdictions

New York

NY, USA

ABA 512NY Bar

Toronto

ON, Canada

FLSCLSO

London

UK

SRA

Frankfurt

Germany

EU AI ActBRAK
Rules by Office

Bar rules and AI laws mapped to each office, so obligations follow the lawyer wherever they practice.

Acceptable Use Policy

v2.1
Approved

Training acknowledgement

3/4 · 75%

SC

Sarah Chen

Mar 12
MP

Marcus Patel

Mar 14
ET

Élise Tremblay

Mar 18
DO

David Okonkwo

Pending
Policies and Training Records

AI policies, guidance, and training records in one place — defensible proof your lawyers were trained.

AI Governance Report

Q1 2026 · Generated Mar 28

Ready · PDF

Tools

12 registered

Policies

3 current

Training

87% complete

Sessions

1,247 captured

Evidence for Questions and Audits

Pre-built reports tying tools, policies, training, and usage into one answer for any audit.

SC

Sarah Chen

·

ChatGPT

Today 2:47 PM · Hartwell Industries

Flagged

User prompt

Draft a motion to dismiss for the Hartwell deposition. Here's the witness statement: "Mr. Hartwell admitted under oath that he…"

Policy analysis · Critical

Confidential client testimony shared with a personal AI account.

ABA 512 · Confidentiality (1.6)Firm AUP §3.2
Activity Monitoring

Captures every AI session in real time — firm devices, personal browsers, sanctioned tools or not.

Compliance Health

72% overall

ABA 512

United States

78%

4 of 5 categories

FLSC

Canada

91%

6 of 6 categories

SRA

United Kingdom

65%

3 of 4 categories

EU AI Act

European Union

52%

2 of 4 categories

Compliance Dashboards

At-a-glance compliance health by jurisdiction, office, and obligation — built for risk committees.

What we hear

What firms are struggling with when AI lands in the practice.

A woman sitting at a desk in a bright office, working on a laptop with notebooks, a cup, and a desk lamp beside her.

We hear the same questions over and over from GCs, risk partners, and CIOs. Tools are spreading across the firm faster than policy can keep up, and nobody can answer the basics on demand: who is using what, on which matters, under which rules.

CounselGuard exists because those questions deserve a real answer, not another memo. The cards on the right are the ones we hear most.

“We do not have a current list of AI tools our people are using.”

General Counsel, AmLaw 200

“We cannot quickly show clients or bars how we govern AI.”

Risk Partner, mid-size firm

“AI policies exist, but we have no easy way to tell if people follow them.”

Chief Compliance Officer

“Different offices face different rules, and it is hard to track them all.”

CIO, multi-jurisdiction firm

A man wearing glasses and a blazer working at a desk, writing in a notebook beside a computer monitor in a modern office.
What we cover

4

Frameworks tracked

Coverage grows as new rules land.

100+

AI tools cataloged

A living inventory firms can keep accurate.

1 packet

Audit-ready evidence

Pull a single bundle when a client or regulator asks.

ABA Opinion 512United States
EU AI ActEuropean Union
FLSC Model CodeCanada
SRA StandardsUnited Kingdom
Harvey
CoCounsel
Copilot
ChatGPT
Claude
Gemini
Perplexity
Lexis+ AI
Spellbook
Kira

+ 90 more in the catalog. Coverage grows with the firms we work with.

Our Values

Why firms pick CounselGuard

The AI governance layer law firms actually need — built around the rules of the jurisdictions where your lawyers practice.

Built for the rules you answer to

Every captured AI session is scored against the obligations that apply where your lawyers practice — ABA 512, FLSC, state bar opinions, EU AI Act, and your own firm policy.

Compliance, scored continuously

Every captured session updates your standing against the frameworks your firm has turned on.

ABA Formal Opinion 512

In progress

78%

Compliant

Competence (1.1)

4/4

Confidentiality (1.6)

6/6

Communication (1.4)

3/3

Supervision (5.1 / 5.3)

2/4

Fees (1.5)

1/2

CounselGuard activity feed showing AI sessions across the firm, with one session under investigation and one flagged for using an unregistered tool.
Catches shadow AI

The desktop agent and Chrome extension see every model your people touch — personal ChatGPT, free Claude, embedded copilots — not just what IT approved.

Defensible audit trail

Tamper-evident logs of prompts, responses, and policy decisions. When a client, regulator, or insurer asks, the answer is ready.

FAQ

Frequently Asked Questions

Quick answers to the questions firms ask before signing on. If yours is not here, talk to us and we will tell you straight.

Firms where AI is already in use and someone — a GC, a risk partner, a CIO — is the one who has to answer for it. Most of our users sit in the 50–1,500 lawyer range, in jurisdictions that have started writing rules (US, EU, Canada, UK). If nobody at your firm is being asked AI questions yet, you don't need us yet.

We import them as-is, version them, and map each section to the obligations it covers. You'll see exactly which clauses satisfy which rules and where the gaps are. We don't rewrite your policy. Your reviewers approve every change through the same workflow they already use for any firm policy.

Whichever offices and bars you practice in. Today that includes ABA Opinion 512, the EU AI Act, the FLSC Model Code, and the SRA Standards. Activity captured in an office is attributed to the rules that govern it, so a New York matter and a London matter sit under different obligations automatically.

A week of real work, not a quarter of integration. SSO, the desktop agent, and the Chrome extension go in on day one. From there you map offices, jurisdictions, monitored individuals, and reviewers. Your compliance lead drives it; we sit in the working sessions and clear blockers in real time.

Your tenant is isolated, hosted in the region you choose, and nothing crosses the boundary unless you ask it to. Model calls run with provider training disabled, captures are sanitized before any analysis, and access is scoped per-firm. No model is trained on your data, by us or by anyone we route to.

Twenty minutes on a call. We walk your jurisdictions, offices, and the tools your people are already using, then send a scoped pilot. Pilots run against real activity so the answer to "is this worth it" comes from your own data, not a deck.

Get in Touch

Make your AI governance defensible

We respond with a brief note on whether we are a fit and, if so, suggest a short call.